Probable Cause and Articulable Suspicion in Drunk Driving Cases

Thanks to Matthew Ruff, a respected Los Angeles DUI Lawyer who handles cases throughout California, for a recent post concerning the main reasons that the police pull people over for a DUI.

In his article, Ruff notes that the National Highway Safety Transportation Safety Administration has identified a number of behaviors that suggest a probability of driver intoxication (the basis for the police to stop a driver):

  • Turning the car with a wide radius;
  • Straddling the center or a lane line or marker;
  • Appearing to be drunk or visibly intoxicated;
  • Almost striking a fixed roadside object or vehicle;
  • Weaving within or outside a lane of travel;
  • Driving the vehicle somewhere other than the designated roadway;
  • Swerving in a sudden fashion;
  • Driving at a slow speed;
  • Stopping the car in the lane without cause;
  • Following another vehicle too closely, improper or unsafe distance;
  • Drifting in and out of the lane;
  • Tires traveling on center or lane marker;
  • Braking suddenly or erratically;
  • Driving into opposing or crossing traffic;
  • Signaling a turn inconsistent with driving actions;
  • Stopping inappropriately other than in lane;
  • Slow response to green lights or other traffic signals;
  • Turning abruptly or illegally, in violation of traffic laws;
  • Accelerating or decelerating rapidly; or 
  • Headlights off at night.

He further points out that once a driver is pulled over, the following behaviors indicate some level of intoxication on the part of the driver (and provide probable cause for an officer to conduct field sobriety tests):

  • Difficulty with vehicle controls;
  • Difficulty exiting vehicle;
  • Fumbling with a drivers license or registration;
  • Repeating questions or comments to the officer;
  • Swaying, unsteadiness or balance problems while speaking to the police officer;
  • Leaning on the vehicle;
  • Slurred, thick or drunken speech;
  • Slowness in responding to questions, or asking officer to repeat questions;
  • Providing incorrect information or changing answers; or
  • Odor of an alcoholic beverage.

Keep in mind that one of the key defenses in a DWI case is the argument that the arresting officer did not have an "articulable basis" for the stop that resulted in a drunk driving charge or probable cause to conduct field sobriety tests. If the court agrees, a DWI stemming from an illegal stop or a legally insufficient demand to submit to testing will be dismissed.

Basis for Law Enforcement to Perform Field Sobriety Tests in Minnesota

In order for an officer to require a driver to submit to field sobriety tests and a preliminary breath test, they must have witnessed something that warranted a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the driver was impaired by alcohol. Probable cause is not a prerequisite to obtaining a PBT or compelling a driver to submit to field sobriety testing.

There are four key ways in which an officer can articulate suspicion of drunk driving:

  1. Driving Conduct. The behavior of driver often provides the basis for a stop. If an officer witnesses a driver who appears unable to control a vehicle, drives unusually fast or slow, weaves, accelerates excessively, makes wide turns or attempts to evade law enforcement, sufficient suspicion exists to pull a driver over.
  2. Characteristics of the Driver. Once a driver is pulled over, the officer will look for visual clues of intoxication, including watery eyes, bloodshot eyes, flushed face, dilated pupils, slow reaction to light, difficulty in moving within the vehicle and the presence of bottles or other drug paraphernalia in the vehicle.
  3. Odor. In addition to witnessing a driver's physical characteristics, the officer will report whether an odor of alcohol was found on the person's breath or in the car. Any unusual odor, including breath sprays or other materials use to mask the smell of alcohol, may also serve as a foundation for further testing.
  4. Audible Evidence. Finally, the officer will always speak with the driver in a way geared toward determining whether the person has consumed alcohol. Routine questions may be asked, with an ear toward slurred speech, delayed response or angry reactions.

Once the officer has pieced together a number of these elements, it is safe to say that the stop was legal, giving the officer the authority to conduct further testing to determine whether there is probable cause to arrest the driver for DWI.

Arrested for DWI in Minnesota? Avoid These Common Mistakes

Troy Burleson is a respected Texas DWI lawyer with offices in Dallas. He recently posted about the biggest mistakes most people make after being arrested for a DWI:

  1. Thinking that being charged with DWI is not a serious matter. A DWI charge is a very serious matter. You face fines, jail time, loss of driving privileges and other hidden costs like raised insurance rates and the possible denial of certain employment opportunities. Also, a DWI conviction will be on your record forever. A DWI conviction cannot be removed from your criminal record for any reason.
  2. Representing yourself. The DWI laws in Minnesota are complicated and combine elements of civil, criminal and governmental law. Even lawyers who do not specialize in DWI case often times struggle with DWI laws. For the best results, you should choose a qualified, experienced DWI lawyer for the best possible outcome for your case.
  3. Choosing an attorney based solely on cost. Your opponent in this lawsuit is the State of Minnesota.  It has almost unlimited resources (attorneys, investigators, police, etc) to prosecute you. You should expect to pay a fair fee based upon the time, effort, experience and reputation of the attorney. If you choose the lowest price, you are certain to obtain the least amount of effort toward defending your case.
  4. Not asking the attorney about her/his DWI experience. Do not be afraid to ask your attorney what his or her experience is with DWI cases. Ask, (1) how many DWI cases the attorney handles per year, (2) how many DWI cases has he or she taken to trial, (3) what specialized training does your attorney have in regard to DWI, (4) how vigorously does your attorney fight to prevent your driving privileges from being suspended, etc.
  5. Agreeing to the first plea offer from the prosecutor. When you accept a plea your are admitting to the crime for which your were charged. In addition, you are waiving your Constitutional rights. Plus, very few prosecuting attorneys have the authority to dismiss or even reduce a DWI offense. Without a thorough investigation of your case, you cannot possibly know whether or not their offer is reasonable.
  6. Failing to appear on your court dates. When you posted your bond and were released from jail you promised to appear at every court date you are given. If you fail to appear for these dates, your bond will be forfeited and a warrant will be issued for your arrest. Additionally, a judge may decide to place you in jail until your trial date.
  7. Hiring an attorney who is not an experienced DWI attorney to represent you. It is simple, if you needed a root canal, you wouldn’t go to an eye doctor, right? Lawyers are like doctors, the specialize in certain area of the law. DWI is a highly specialized area of law. Different facts involve different provisions of the law. There is no substitute for actual, hard earned experience when it comes to defending clients accused of DWI. Prosecutors know who the experts in the field of DWI are and which attorneys are tough in trial. You want the most competent person to represent you when your freedom in at risk. Therefore, only choose an experienced attorney dedicated to the practice of DWI defense.
  8. Think that talking to numerous attorneys will help you handle it on your own. Without an attorney, you are relying in the kindness and integrity of your major opponent. Without knowing the rules that govern the entire process, you may be prevented from even presenting any meaningful defense.

Good work Troy! I would add one more, specific to Minnesota. Most of our new clients don't understand the limitations and time frames imposed on their driver's license following a DWI arrest. Minnesota has one of the toughest administrative sanctions in the country. We've posted about them within our Blog.

EZ DWI Guide: Publication of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in partnership with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety has published a summary of Minnesota DWI & DUI statutes entitled "EZ DWI: A Quick Reference Guide for the Enforcment of DWI and Related Statutes." If you've been charged with a DUI, we know you'll find this information helpful. Click to read the Minnesota DWI EZ Guide.