Probable Cause and Articulable Suspicion in Drunk Driving Cases

Thanks to Matthew Ruff, a respected Los Angeles DUI Lawyer who handles cases throughout California, for a recent post concerning the main reasons that the police pull people over for a DUI.

In his article, Ruff notes that the National Highway Safety Transportation Safety Administration has identified a number of behaviors that suggest a probability of driver intoxication (the basis for the police to stop a driver):

  • Turning the car with a wide radius;
  • Straddling the center or a lane line or marker;
  • Appearing to be drunk or visibly intoxicated;
  • Almost striking a fixed roadside object or vehicle;
  • Weaving within or outside a lane of travel;
  • Driving the vehicle somewhere other than the designated roadway;
  • Swerving in a sudden fashion;
  • Driving at a slow speed;
  • Stopping the car in the lane without cause;
  • Following another vehicle too closely, improper or unsafe distance;
  • Drifting in and out of the lane;
  • Tires traveling on center or lane marker;
  • Braking suddenly or erratically;
  • Driving into opposing or crossing traffic;
  • Signaling a turn inconsistent with driving actions;
  • Stopping inappropriately other than in lane;
  • Slow response to green lights or other traffic signals;
  • Turning abruptly or illegally, in violation of traffic laws;
  • Accelerating or decelerating rapidly; or 
  • Headlights off at night.

He further points out that once a driver is pulled over, the following behaviors indicate some level of intoxication on the part of the driver (and provide probable cause for an officer to conduct field sobriety tests):

  • Difficulty with vehicle controls;
  • Difficulty exiting vehicle;
  • Fumbling with a drivers license or registration;
  • Repeating questions or comments to the officer;
  • Swaying, unsteadiness or balance problems while speaking to the police officer;
  • Leaning on the vehicle;
  • Slurred, thick or drunken speech;
  • Slowness in responding to questions, or asking officer to repeat questions;
  • Providing incorrect information or changing answers; or
  • Odor of an alcoholic beverage.

Keep in mind that one of the key defenses in a DWI case is the argument that the arresting officer did not have an "articulable basis" for the stop that resulted in a drunk driving charge or probable cause to conduct field sobriety tests. If the court agrees, a DWI stemming from an illegal stop or a legally insufficient demand to submit to testing will be dismissed.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.mndwiblog.com/admin/trackback/153546
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.